User Login

1051Cover
Weekly Dig
[News to Us]

Ironing Out Democracy

A fine history of screwing voters

By Cara Bayles

NWS_BilingualBallotsLG

With one month left before this year's legislative session ends, the clock is ticking on numerous bills, most of which will fade into irrelevancy come July 31st. This year saw an influx of voting bills, and Avi Green, of MassVote, is optimistic some will squeeze through.

"I'm incredibly hopeful," he enthuses. "We're late in the game, and all of these bills are still alive. That's hopeful."

The bills awaiting a verdict aim to smooth out inequities and increase turnout.

"Here's a trivia question: How long before the election should you register to vote?" Green asks. "Twenty-one days. A lot of people know the reasons they're passionate about a candidate, but if you don't know the answer to the trivia question, you're SOL." As a poll worker, Green had to turn away unregistered voters. "We give them a registration form as a consolation prize and say, 'See ya next year.'"

Bilingual ballots could continue to boost turnout. In 2005, the Department of Justice supervised elections in Boston's immigrant communities, and sued the city for violating the Voting Rights Act. The court mandated bilingual poll workers and ballots in Spanish, Chinese and Vietnamese.

The agreement expires in 2008. The city already approved legislation maintaining bilingual ballots, this time with candidates' names transliterated. Amy Leung, with the Chinese Progressive Association, explains current ballots offer multilingual instructions, with names printed in the Roman alphabet. "It's not fully bilingual if it doesn't include transliterated names," she says. "If I gave an English speaker a ballot with everything in English, except the name in Chinese characters, it would still be difficult to read."

Secretary of State William Galvin implements all things electoral. His spokesman, Brian McNiff, says he worries about writing names phonetically. "He believes that could lead to confusion with the voters," McNiff says. (His typical example is "Menino" sounds like the Chinese word for "imbecile" ... the classic response being that English-speakers who voted for Bush didn't elect a shrub.) "As a general rule, we don't favor election rules that only apply to particular communities."

If the legislature doesn't pass the home-rule petition, Bostonians lose bilingual ballots. The Greater Boston Chinese Golden Age Center's Ruth Moy says this could limit voter turnout, particularly among elderly immigrants. "I think the elderly are eager to vote, but they hesitate if they don't know how to read the ballot," she says.

Another bill is concerned with giving votes equal weight. The Electoral College allots each state electors (based on population), who all vote for their state's winning candidate, reducing the complexities of voting maps to the familiar "red" and "blue" states. In the 2000, 1888, 1876 and 1824 elections, the candidate with fewer votes won the Electoral College, and the presidency.

Pam Wilmot is executive director of the Massachusetts branch of Common Cause, an organization attempting to replace the Electoral College with a national popular vote. Legislation approving the switch has passed in Maryland, Illinois and New Jersey, and is pending in many states.

"We tend to sit out presidential elections, since whatever margin you win by, you get all the electors. In Massachusetts, it's pretty clear the Democrat will win, so campaigns focus on swing states," she says. "Some people remember they learned in civics class that small states benefit from this. They do in theory, but don't in fact."

Green says the Electoral College belongs to a history of denying voting rights, dating back to the three-fifths compromise in the Constitution. "Slave owners voted 'on behalf' of their slaves, so they had more electors than northerners. African-Americans, women and men without property were not allowed to vote," he says. "The history of our country has been overcoming that critical initial defect, slowly but surely extending the vote and making sure those votes were equal."


The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes—that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would make every vote politically relevant in a presidential election. It would make every vote equal. The National Popular Vote bill has been approved by 19 legislative chambers (one house in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, and two houses in Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont). It has been enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring this legislation into effect. To be involved in the National Popular Vote bill effort . . . Check the status of the bill in MA at http://nationalpopularvote.com/pages/states.php?s=MA Let your legislator(s) know what you think. If you need help to identify and/or contact your state representatives, senators, and/or governor about National Popular Vote, you can search by your zip code using online sites such as http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home . Sign up to get email updates - http://www.NationalPopularVote.com/pages/getemailupdates.php Help get the word out and show your support. Tell a friend- http://www.NationalPopularVote.com/pages/tellafriend.php Distribute literature at political, civic, or other meeting, convention, or conference. Post on discussion groups. Write letters to editors, OpEds, and/or blog. Responses to many common misinformed critiques are at http://nationalpopularvote.com/pages/faq.php Up-to-date information and materials are at http://www.NationalPopularVote.com/pages/explanation.php susan
Submitted by mvymvy on Thu, 06/26/2008 - 2:59pm.

Featured Blogs

My Top 10 of 2008

By dayvidday on Mon, Dec 29, 2008 8:32 pm

 

Every loopy music scribe this side of the sun makes a year-end list to ensure their consistent, low-paying listening didn't go to a complete waste. Here's mine, with some off-the-cuff comments to sound all snarky-like and videos to boot. These are in no particular order, fwiw:

Let Them Eat Cake

By dayvidday on Mon, Dec 22, 2008 2:06 pm

 

Hard to believe, but unfortunately, not the least bit surprising:

 

"After receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation's largest banks say they can't track exactly how they're spending the money or they simply refuse to discuss it."

 


Barney's website

By Media Farm on Mon, Dec 15, 2008 6:13 pm

Why are we just discovering this now, with precious few days left in the Bush administration?

 

Barney has his own website

 

Can you imagine if this were the Bush administration's only job?

 






Copyright © 1999 - 2008 Dig Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved.